Science And Chloroquine and Masks

Oddly enough, I came by this website, The NW Connection via a Danish website. They had published an image from an article at that site by Bryan Fischer, Opinion: Fauci Knew About HCQ In 2005 – Nobody Needed To Die.

The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread [...] Write the researchers, “We report [...] that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci has known for 15 years that chloroquine and its even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).

This article was originally published back at the end of April, 2020. A few months later, at the end of September, the same author published Opinion: It Is Scientifically Impossible For Masks To Work.

Here is information from the CDC, which is the Vatican of virology for anti-Trumpers. Last spring [2020], after looking at 10 randomized controlled trials (the gold standard as far as Dr. Fauci is concerned), the CDC concluded. “[T]he CDC, as late as May, was citing the 10 randomized controlled trials that showed “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.

The author refers to and quotes from an article by David Horowitz in The Blaze (Sept, 2020), How we have been lied to so dramatically about masks. He concludes with this statement:

“We have become emasculated as a society. We have become a people who are willing to surrender every morsel of our liberty at the ever-changing and capricious whims of ‘public health officials,’ even when they are appallingly contradictory and without any evidence justifying the 180-degree U-turn … our passivity has allowed our entire country to become a Halloween nightmare masquerade every day, with no end in sight.”

Update(20210215): I’m not sure about the quality of this study, but I’ll add it because it seems to conform with other similar studies having the same conclusion. Via a tweet from Jesse Kelly he comments on another tweet that states:

This is a very important study on vitamin D and Covid-19. Its findings are incredibly clear. An 80% reduction in need for ICU and a 60% reduction in deaths, simply by giving a very cheap and very safe therapy – calcifediol, or activated vitamin D. Study is here.

Update(20210420): Here’s another article from the National Institute of Health (NIH) from back in October, Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis. Here’s the conclusion:

The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of
wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data
suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to
block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.

Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse
physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hyper­
capnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of
fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression,
fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for
viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.
Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deteri­
oration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature
death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should
utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to
wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive inter­
vention for public health.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.