in the same mind-blowing sense as this one.
From a comment to a post at Shot In the Dark discussing the city of Minneapolis and its feelings about [gay] “conversion therapy” for people under 18. (Lots more interesting comments as well.)
Here’s a thought exercise I’ve had with lefties that have resulted in obscenities being screamed in my general direction:
Let’s say conversion therapy is immoral because homosexuality is genetic and not behavioral. Let’s say genetic researchers discovered the gene or genes that correlate to homosexual tendencies. Considering documented trends toward sex-selective abortions in Asia and the likelihood of it happening in the developed world, would it be moral or immoral to abort or keep a fetus based upon “gay” gene or genes?
You can delay that decision right up to the point of birth, if I understand correctly.